Performance evaluation and acceptability of the mechanized onion pesticide sprayer
Keywords:
mechanized onion pesticide sprayer, efficiency evaluation, improved resource utilizationAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the performance and overall acceptability of the mechanized onion pesticide sprayer across multiple criteria, including functionality, durability, safety, and mobility, as well as to assess its performance efficiency in terms of discharge rate, noise level, fuel consumption, spray range, and field efficiency.The prototype was evaluated through a series of tests, including functionality, durability, safety and mobility , discharge uniformity, coverage area, rate of work, field efficiency, and standard time. Test results revealed that the mechanized sprayer outperformed traditional and solar-powered alternatives in all aspects. It achieved excellent ratings for functionality, durability, safety, and mobility, ensuring effective and safe operation. The sprayer also demonstrated consistent discharge uniformity across nozzles, preventing uneven pesticide application. Additionally, the sprayer covered a significantly larger area compared to other sprayer types, reducing spraying time and improving operational efficiency. Furthermore, the sprayer achieved a faster rate of work and higher field efficiency, indicating efficient resource utilization. Finally, the time and motion study confirmed a faster standard time for operating the mechanized sprayer. Overall, the efficiency test results convincingly demonstrate that the mechanized onion pesticide sprayer is an acceptable solution for farmers, offering consistent application, broad coverage, faster operation, and improved resource utilization compared to traditional methods.
References
Ahmad, F., Khaliq, A., Qiu, B., Sultan, M., & Ma, J. (2021). Advancements of spraying technology in agriculture. In IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98500
Capiral, C. V. C., Lotrinia, R. J. T., Mabborang, R. C., & Macasieb, J. R. (2023). Cracking the code of crop growth: illuminating the future of Philippines’ onion production for a resilient Filipino diet with the ARMA forecasting model. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 11(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol11n3123
Chamim, A. N. N., Maulana, H.,Purwanto, K., Syahputra, R., & Prasetyo, T. I. (2018). Design of backpack sprayer with electrical pumping system using quality function development approach to optimize the agricultural facility. Journal of Electrical Technology UMY, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.18196/jet.2442
Dai, S., Ou, M., Du, W., Yang, X., Xiang, D., Jiang, L., Zhang, T., Ding, S., & Jia, W. (2023). Effects of sprayer speed, spray distance, and nozzle arrangement angle on low-flow air-assisted spray deposition. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1184244
De Carvalho Castro Penido, É., Teixeira, M. M., Fernándes, H. C., Monteiro, P. B. S., & Cecon, P. R. (2019). Development and evaluation of a remotely controlled and monitored self-propelled sprayer in tomato crops. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 50(1). Retrieved from, https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20190002
Food and Agriculture Organization (2022). Agricultural production statistics. 2000–2021. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No. 60. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3751en
Gafoor, A., Khan, F., Khorsandi, F., Khan, M. A., Nauman, H. M., & Farid, M. U. (2022). Development and evaluation of a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer for agricultural sustainability in small farms. Sustainability, 14(15), 9204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159204
Lambrecht, E., Da Rosa, D. S., Machado, R., Machado, A. L. T., & Reis, Â. V. D. (2019). Knapsack sprayers: effort required for pumping lever operation. Ciencia Rural, 49(8). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20181012
Lopes, E. S., De Oliveira, F. M., & Rodrigues, C. K. (2011). Determinação da carga física de trabalho na atividade de aplicação manual de herbicida / Determination of demanded physical effort in herbicide application activity. Ambiência, 7(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.5777/ambiencia.2011.02.10
Lopez, J. S., Rincon, V., Paez, F., & Fernandez, M. (2012). Comparative spray deposits by manually pulled trolley sprayer and a spray gun in greenhouse tomato crops. Crop Protection, 31(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.10.007
Shearer, A. (2018). Development of a sprayer performance diagnostic tool using improved mapping and error quantification practices. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosysengdiss/80/
Tamilselvi, P., & Dhanabalan, A. K. (2016). Ergonomic evaluation of conventional agricultural sprayerswith respect to human performance. Agricultural Science Digest – a Research Journal, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.18805/asd.v36i3.11443
Tecson, J. (2016). Ergonomics evaluation of lever-operated knapsack sprayer. Proceedings In The 17th Asia-Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Society Conference. https://apiems2016.conf.tw/site/page.aspx?pid=901&sid=1087&lang=en
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jhon Raymond L. Casuncad, Jerson Mabbagu, Karen H. Geronimo, Danica Q. Songco, Abigail N. Gonzales (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
