Employee engagement and offıce ınnovatıons ın government offıces
Keywords:
employee engagement, government employees, office innovation, purposive sampling technique, researcher-made instrumentAbstract
Engagement and innovation are the common changes faced by the government employees after the pandemic at their respective workplace. Given this case, employee engagement and office innovation as well as the relationship between the two has become prevalent topic of this discussion. This study seeks to identify the level and relatioship of employee engagement and office innovation. In pursuit of the objectives, this study employed a purposive sampling technique and a researcher-made instrument was used to conduct a face-to-face data gathering from the employees of government offices in San Jose, Occidental Mindoro. This study reveals that the level of employee engagement and office innovation was very high and also shows that office innovations is significantly and positively related to employee engagement. This suggests that office innovation can contribute to employee engagement by improving the work environment and processes, but it is not the only factor that affects employee engagement.
References
Budriene, D., & Diskiene, D. (2020). Employee engagement: types, levels and relationship with practice of HRM. Malaysian E Commerce Journal, 4(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.26480/mecj.02.2020.42.47
De Borja, J. A. (2021). Overseas Filipino workers and the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the emotional labor of persistence. Emotion, Space and Society, 41, 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100838
Duradoni M, & Fabio A. (2019). Intrapreneurial self-capital and sustainable innovative behavior within organizations. Sustainability. 11(2) 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020322
Faturochman. (2016). The Job Characteristics Theory: A review. Buletin Psikologi, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.13552
Fuchs, B., Kuk, T., Wiechmann, D. (2021). Adequate office interior design. In: Seiferlein, W., Kohlert, C. (eds) The Networked Health-Relevant Factors for Office Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59226-4_4
Kunina, E. V. (2021). The role of organizational innovations in the development of Russian enterprises. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series Economics Management Law, 1, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2021-1-16-27
Lee, M., & Kim, B. (2023). Effect of employee experience on organizational commitment: Case of South Korea. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070521
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Educational Technology-Related Studies based on Rogers’ Theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14–23. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501453.pdf
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Yunus, E. N., & Ernawati, E. (2018). Productivity paradox? The impact of office redesign on employee productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1918–1939. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2017-0350
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marian M. Badiana, Lourraine Lady January R. Lastimosa, Floreden Y. Alarcon, Stefanie D. Caringal, Mary Cris A. Escondo, Ramon D. Fajardo II, Susana F. Ophiar, Jason G. Ramirez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
